Keno statistics

Lotto Mini Plus Multi Euro Kaskada Keno

Game pills lead to that game's statistics; choose the range there (Keno covers at most the last 1000 draws, about 4 days).

Tables computed from recent Keno draws (20 out of 70 numbers, a draw every 4 minutes). Every view states how many draws it covers, the time span and when the data was updated. Statistics describe past draws and do not improve the odds of any set in the next draw — every draw is independent.

100 draws; from 09.10.2026, 13:42 to 09.10.2026, 20:18 (Warsaw time); Last successful data publication: 09.10.2026, 20:20.

Statistics describe past draws and do not improve the odds of any set in the next draw.

Number frequency 1–70

How many times each number was drawn in the selected window. Expected frequency of every number: 28.57 (20/70 of draws).

1 24
2 30
3 24
4 39
5 24
6 31
7 40
8 27
9 37
10 35
11 23
12 29
13 23
14 30
15 27
16 29
17 28
18 34
19 29
20 35
21 30
22 22
23 33
24 23
25 35
26 27
27 30
28 30
29 26
30 30
31 32
32 29
33 29
34 30
35 28
36 25
37 28
38 31
39 32
40 26
41 23
42 24
43 30
44 28
45 29
46 29
47 37
48 23
49 24
50 21
51 25
52 25
53 23
54 25
55 26
56 32
57 30
58 31
59 31
60 37
61 25
62 19
63 29
64 32
65 31
66 25
67 27
68 31
69 22
70 32

Most frequent in window

7 40 times
4 39 times
9 37 times
47 37 times
60 37 times
10 35 times
20 35 times
25 35 times
18 34 times
23 33 times

Least frequent in window

62 19 times
50 21 times
22 22 times
69 22 times
11 23 times
13 23 times
24 23 times
41 23 times
48 23 times
53 23 times

Gaps

How many draws since each number last appeared. The range is wider than the selected window (100): the whole history in the statistics file, i.e. the last 1000 draws, from 03.10.2026, 20:50 to 09.10.2026, 20:18 (Warsaw time). “—” = the number did not appear in this history.

1 13
2 1
3 0
4 6
5 0
6 0
7 1
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 4
12 0
13 0
14 3
15 3
16 2
17 1
18 1
19 5
20 0
21 3
22 8
23 2
24 0
25 1
26 5
27 2
28 1
29 0
30 7
31 1
32 1
33 0
34 1
35 6
36 4
37 0
38 14
39 2
40 1
41 2
42 3
43 0
44 1
45 3
46 1
47 3
48 1
49 3
50 15
51 5
52 0
53 5
54 0
55 4
56 0
57 1
58 8
59 2
60 1
61 1
62 13
63 1
64 0
65 2
66 2
67 0
68 2
69 1
70 0

Even and odd

Distribution of the number of even numbers per draw (0 to 20). Average even numbers: 10.06.

Even and odd
even	draws
5	1
6	1
7	5
8	10
9	17
10	27
11	24
12	7
13	5
14	1
15	2

Sums of the 20 numbers

Lowest 551, highest 872, average 699.3. Distribution in bands of 50.

Sums of the 20 numbers
sum band	draws
550–599	8
600–649	11
650–699	26
700–749	38
750–799	10
800–849	6
850–899	1

Keno results Keno odds calculator

Retrospective assessment uses up to 500 available recent draws. Keno draws 20 of 70; amounts and the multiplier are not assessed.

Replay the past, one draw at a time

Before each assessed draw, nine fixed rules select the same number of main numbers using only earlier results. We then count the overlap with the real result. These are explicit selection rules based on analyses, not a claim that every statistic predicts numbers.

The target draw and all later draws are excluded from every calculation. No future selection or recommended numbers are generated. Additional pools are assessed separately below where available.

One setting for all rules

History size, including initial training draws

Ending at draw Earlier draws used at each step Numbers selected by every rule Rule to inspect in the chart and step table Draws per stability period Your main numbers (optional, up to 20)

All nine rules are always calculated. This selector changes only the chart and inspected steps. Equal scores are resolved by ascending number, without looking at the target draw.

Actual history: 100 · 09.10.2026 13:42 — 09.10.2026 20:18. Assessed steps: 75 (exploration 45, later assessment 30).

What matched the latest assessed draw?

09.10.2026 20:18 · #1514123

Calculations used earlier draws only: #1514098 — #1514122, 09.10.2026 18:38 — 09.10.2026 20:14.

Rule	Earlier selection; ✓ marks overlap	Hits
Most frequent	2 7 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 20 ✓ 25 27 28 31 32 34 35 44 46 47 60 61 64 ✓ 69 70 ✓	5 / 20
Least frequent	1 6 ✓ 8 ✓ 11 13 ✓ 14 15 16 17 18 21 29 ✓ 33 ✓ 45 49 50 52 ✓ 53 58 62	6 / 20
Longest gaps	1 4 5 ✓ 8 ✓ 10 ✓ 11 19 22 26 30 33 ✓ 35 37 ✓ 38 43 ✓ 50 51 53 58 62	6 / 20
Repeats	2 7 9 ✓ 17 18 25 28 31 32 34 40 44 46 48 54 ✓ 57 60 61 63 69	2 / 20
Partners	2 7 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 20 ✓ 25 27 28 31 32 34 35 44 46 47 48 60 61 69 70 ✓	4 / 20
Binary rhythm (2 bits)	7 9 ✓ 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 20 ✓ 23 25 27 28 35 41 42 44 46 48 54 ✓ 56 ✓ 60 63 64 ✓	7 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 1–11; selections with no example: 0.
Binary rhythm (3 bits)	3 ✓ 7 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 19 20 ✓ 23 24 ✓ 27 28 36 37 ✓ 40 41 42 44 56 ✓ 60 64 ✓ 67 ✓	9 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 2–7; selections with no example: 0.
Binary rhythm (4 bits)	3 ✓ 4 7 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 19 20 ✓ 23 26 27 28 29 ✓ 37 ✓ 40 41 42 54 ✓ 56 ✓ 64 ✓ 68	9 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 1–3; selections with no example: 0.
Binary rhythm (5 bits)	2 3 ✓ 7 8 ✓ 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 13 ✓ 23 27 28 37 ✓ 41 42 45 51 54 ✓ 56 ✓ 58 65 66	8 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 0–6; selections with no example: 1.

More overlaps in one draw describe that draw. They do not establish a dependable method.

Which rules matched more often in this history?

The first 60% of assessed steps form exploration. Its leaders are marked below; the ranking uses only the later 40% assessment period. All rules use the same draws and selection size.

Random-model expectation: 20 × 20 / 70 = 5.714 hits per draw; 30 assessment draws → 171.43 total expected hits.

Rank / rule	Exploration mean	Assessment mean	Difference from model	Assessment total	Whole-period mean
1. Binary rhythm (2 bits)	5.644	6.167	0.452	185	5.853
1. Binary rhythm (4 bits)	5.867	6.167	0.452	185	5.987
3. Binary rhythm (3 bits)	5.756	6.133	0.419	184	5.907
4. Binary rhythm (5 bits)Exploration leader (ties possible)	6.267	6.100	0.386	183	6.200
5. Most frequent	5.622	5.800	0.086	174	5.693
6. Least frequent	5.822	5.567	-0.148	167	5.720
7. Longest gaps	5.822	5.467	-0.248	164	5.680
8. Partners	5.489	5.267	-0.448	158	5.400
9. Repeats	5.222	5.167	-0.548	155	5.200

A positive difference is an observation, not statistical proof of an advantage. Comparing nine rules and changing settings after seeing their results increases the risk of finding an accidental leader. Both periods remain retrospective; they are not a preregistered validation.

Accumulated overlap in the later assessment period — Most frequent

Solid line: actual accumulated hits. Dashed line: uniform-model expectation for the same number of draws and selections. The line is not a confidence interval.

X: assessed draws; Y: accumulated hits.

Inspect the latest 20 chronological steps

Target draw	Earlier training IDs	Earlier selection	Hits
09.10.2026 20:18 · #1514123	#1514098 — #1514122	2 7 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 20 ✓ 25 27 28 31 32 34 35 44 46 47 60 61 64 ✓ 69 70 ✓	5 / 20
09.10.2026 20:14 · #1514122	#1514097 — #1514121	2 ✓ 4 5 7 ✓ 10 12 20 23 24 25 ✓ 26 27 31 ✓ 35 46 ✓ 47 60 ✓ 64 69 ✓ 70	7 / 20
09.10.2026 20:10 · #1514121	#1514096 — #1514120	2 ✓ 4 7 ✓ 10 12 ✓ 20 25 ✓ 27 ✓ 31 34 35 42 44 46 47 60 64 67 69 70	5 / 20
09.10.2026 20:06 · #1514120	#1514095 — #1514119	2 ✓ 4 7 10 12 20 ✓ 25 ✓ 27 31 32 34 35 37 44 47 ✓ 55 60 64 67 70 ✓	5 / 20
09.10.2026 20:02 · #1514119	#1514094 — #1514118	2 4 7 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 20 25 27 ✓ 31 32 ✓ 34 35 37 38 44 ✓ 47 ✓ 60 ✓ 64 ✓ 67 ✓ 70	9 / 20
09.10.2026 19:58 · #1514118	#1514093 — #1514117	2 4 7 ✓ 10 12 ✓ 20 25 27 30 31 ✓ 32 34 35 37 ✓ 38 44 47 ✓ 60 67 70	5 / 20
09.10.2026 19:54 · #1514117	#1514092 — #1514116	2 ✓ 4 ✓ 7 ✓ 10 ✓ 12 20 25 ✓ 26 27 30 31 ✓ 32 ✓ 34 ✓ 35 ✓ 37 38 44 47 60 70 ✓	10 / 20
09.10.2026 19:50 · #1514116	#1514091 — #1514115	4 ✓ 7 ✓ 8 12 20 ✓ 25 26 27 30 ✓ 31 32 34 ✓ 35 37 38 44 47 ✓ 58 60 ✓ 64	7 / 20
09.10.2026 19:46 · #1514115	#1514090 — #1514114	2 4 7 ✓ 10 12 ✓ 20 25 26 ✓ 27 31 ✓ 32 35 ✓ 37 38 44 47 58 ✓ 60 ✓ 67 70	7 / 20
09.10.2026 19:42 · #1514114	#1514089 — #1514113	4 7 ✓ 10 ✓ 12 19 20 21 25 26 27 ✓ 31 32 ✓ 35 37 38 44 46 47 58 60	4 / 20
09.10.2026 19:38 · #1514113	#1514088 — #1514112	4 7 8 10 ✓ 12 19 ✓ 20 25 26 27 31 ✓ 32 35 37 ✓ 38 44 46 47 58 64 ✓	5 / 20
09.10.2026 19:34 · #1514112	#1514087 — #1514111	4 7 8 9 10 ✓ 12 ✓ 20 25 26 27 ✓ 31 32 35 ✓ 38 44 ✓ 46 ✓ 47 58 60 64	6 / 20
09.10.2026 19:30 · #1514111	#1514086 — #1514110	4 ✓ 6 7 ✓ 8 9 10 12 20 ✓ 25 ✓ 26 ✓ 27 31 32 34 38 46 47 ✓ 58 64 ✓ 67	7 / 20
09.10.2026 19:26 · #1514110	#1514085 — #1514109	4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 ✓ 25 26 27 ✓ 28 31 32 ✓ 38 46 47 ✓ 58 64 67	4 / 20
09.10.2026 19:22 · #1514109	#1514084 — #1514108	4 ✓ 7 ✓ 8 ✓ 9 10 12 14 19 20 23 26 ✓ 27 28 31 32 35 38 ✓ 46 58 67	5 / 20
09.10.2026 19:18 · #1514108	#1514083 — #1514107	4 ✓ 7 ✓ 9 10 ✓ 12 14 20 25 26 27 28 ✓ 31 ✓ 32 38 46 48 51 58 60 67 ✓	6 / 20
09.10.2026 19:14 · #1514107	#1514082 — #1514106	4 7 ✓ 8 9 10 12 14 19 20 ✓ 27 ✓ 31 32 ✓ 34 35 38 46 48 58 ✓ 60 67	5 / 20
09.10.2026 19:10 · #1514106	#1514081 — #1514105	4 6 7 8 9 ✓ 10 12 ✓ 14 19 20 ✓ 23 25 27 ✓ 28 31 32 ✓ 38 ✓ 46 48 ✓ 58	7 / 20
09.10.2026 19:06 · #1514105	#1514080 — #1514104	4 ✓ 6 7 ✓ 8 10 14 19 20 25 28 31 ✓ 32 35 38 45 46 ✓ 48 49 58 67	4 / 20
09.10.2026 19:02 · #1514104	#1514079 — #1514103	2 4 6 7 8 10 ✓ 12 14 20 28 31 37 38 ✓ 43 45 46 47 49 58 64	2 / 20

Which draw properties matched the earlier history?

For each step, we build an empirical range from the earlier window only: sorted positions floor(0.1 × (N−1)) and ceil(0.9 × (N−1)), inclusive. We check whether the later actual property lies inside it. Discrete values and ties can make coverage exceed 80%. These are descriptive ranges, not confidence intervals or number selections.

Property	Earlier median, latest step	Earlier range	Actual latest value	Inside, later assessment
Sum	707	650–787 (N=25)	615 · outside	24/30 · 80.0%
Range	66	61–68 (N=25)	67 · inside	26/30 · 86.7%
Even numbers	10	8–12 (N=25)	11 · inside	24/30 · 80.0%
High numbers	10	8–12 (N=25)	8 · inside	27/30 · 90.0%
Repeats from the preceding draw	5	4–7 (N=24)	2 · outside	26/30 · 86.7%
Band 1–10	3	2–5 (N=25)	6 · outside	26/30 · 86.7%
Band 11–20	2	1–4 (N=25)	3 · inside	26/30 · 86.7%
Band 21–30	3	2–5 (N=25)	2 · inside	28/30 · 93.3%
Band 31–40	3	1–5 (N=25)	2 · inside	25/30 · 83.3%
Band 41–50	3	1–4 (N=25)	1 · inside	25/30 · 83.3%
Band 51–60	3	1–4 (N=25)	3 · inside	30/30 · 100.0%
Band 61–70	3	1–5 (N=25)	3 · inside	26/30 · 86.7%

Properties have different units and are not ranked together by number hits. Bands are 1–10, 11–20, etc.; the final band ends at the pool limit. Repeat examples require a predecessor within the earlier window, so their sample is one draw shorter.

Does the historical leader remain the same?

The later assessment is divided into consecutive, non-overlapping periods. All tied leaders are shown; the final incomplete period remains visible. Periods below 15 draws are marked as small.

Changes in the set of leaders: 1/1 period boundaries.

Period	N	Leaders, including ties	Leader total
09.10.2026 18:22 — 09.10.2026 19:58	25	Binary rhythm (2 bits)	153
09.10.2026 20:02 — 09.10.2026 20:18	5 · small sample	Binary rhythm (5 bits)	35

Changing a period size after seeing the outcome is retrospective fitting. This view does not establish a dependable rule.

Your selection in the same history

Enter your main numbers in the form above or open this view from My number report.

Save this historical assessment

JSON stores settings and calculated results; CSV contains the ranking. The HTML snapshot can be opened without internet and contains the visible assessment, not a new offline calculation. Exports include your entered numbers: share them only deliberately.

Exactly what is being compared?

Most frequent

Highest hit counts in the earlier window.

Least frequent

Lowest hit counts in the earlier window.

Longest gaps

Longest absence at the end of the earlier window. A number absent throughout the window has a gap of at least that window length.

Repeats

Numbers from the last earlier draw come first; numeric order resolves the remaining ties.

Partners

Sum of co-occurrence shares with numbers from the last earlier draw. Each partner count is divided by the anchor number’s frequency; self-pairs are excluded.

Binary rhythm (2 bits)

For each number, take its final two earlier presence bits, find that pattern in the earlier window, and measure how often a 1 followed it. Add two model-weighted pseudo-observations. A pattern without previous examples receives the model baseline.

Binary rhythm (3 bits)

Uses the final 3 earlier bits and known historical successors, with the same two model-weighted pseudo-observations as the two-bit rule. No earlier examples means the model baseline.

Binary rhythm (4 bits)

Uses the final 4 earlier bits and known historical successors, with the same two model-weighted pseudo-observations as the two-bit rule. No earlier examples means the model baseline.

Binary rhythm (5 bits)

Uses the final 5 earlier bits and known historical successors, with the same two model-weighted pseudo-observations as the two-bit rule. No earlier examples means the model baseline.

Sums, parity, ranges and decades describe a whole draw. They cannot fairly be ranked by number overlap without inventing additional selection rules. This page therefore compares only the nine rules defined above. Each independent draw retains the same odds.

What these tables show

Frequency tells how many times each of the 70 numbers was drawn in the selected window; with 20 numbers per draw the expected frequency of every number is 20/70 of the draws. The gap is the number of draws since a number last appeared in the whole available history. Even/odd and sums describe the structure of draws: how many even numbers and which sum of 20 numbers appeared most often.

What these statistics do not do

They do not suggest numbers to play and do not say how much to play. A number that was "hot" in the last 100 draws has exactly the same chance in the next draw as any other: 20 out of 70. Pairs, triples and the full history will be described separately once more draws have been collected.